Reviews every PR
Finds exploitable issues before they are merged.
Hacktron Review is an AI security reviewer for pull requests. It reads changes with codebase context, finds exploitable vulnerabilities, and gives engineers fixes inside GitHub.
Finds exploitable issues before they are merged.
Indexes repositories and call graphs instead of only reading the diff.
Detects remediation commits and resolves stale alerts automatically.
Install the GitHub App and choose the repos Hacktron should review.
Hacktron posts inline findings with the context needed to reproduce and fix the issue.
Triage comments and .hacktron/rules.md teach Hacktron what matters in your app.
Findings are posted on the vulnerable lines in GitHub, so the review stays attached to the code that introduced the risk.
A finding that matters in a payments flow may be noise in an internal tool. Hacktron learns from your triage comments and adapts to the threat model of each codebase.
When the next commit patches a vulnerability, Hacktron recognizes the fix and closes the finding without waiting for manual cleanup.
Use .hacktron/rules.md to describe auth patterns, trusted sources, ignored paths, and conventions unique to your application.
Hacktron Review is built for web, mobile, backend, API, CLI, and native codebases. It focuses on exploitable behavior, not long lists of low value alerts.
Pipe findings into Slack for visibility and Linear for tracking, so security work does not disappear into a dashboard nobody checks.
Zellify builds Web2App infrastructure for mobile app companies, with fast-moving payment, onboarding, growth, and experimentation flows.
Multiple critical vulnerabilities found and fixed within 24 hours, and security is now built into the development process.
At Zellify, security is a core priority. Before Hacktron, we relied on a combination of manual code reviews and automated security tools from established providers to audit both pull requests and our existing codebase. While this setup gave us a baseline level of confidence, it still required significant manual effort and, as we later discovered, left critical gaps.
When we transitioned to Hacktron and ran a full audit of our codebase, the results were immediate and eye-opening. Hacktron uncovered multiple critical vulnerabilities that had gone completely undetected by other widely used tools on the market. These were not minor issues. They were serious weaknesses that could have been exploited with severe consequences if discovered by malicious actors.
What stood out was not just the depth of the findings, but how quickly Hacktron delivered value. Within a single audit, we identified and resolved risks that had previously gone unnoticed despite using what are often considered best-in-class solutions.
Today, Hacktron is a core part of our security workflow. We rely on it to continuously safeguard our software and infrastructure while significantly reducing manual overhead.
For teams currently relying on traditional automated security tools, trying Hacktron is an easy decision. In our experience, it surfaces issues that other providers simply miss and does so with a level of speed and precision that is hard to match.
A quick rundown of how Hacktron Review fits into pull request security workflows.
No. Hacktron Review uses repository context and call graphs to reason about exploitability, not only syntax patterns. With advanced AI reasoning, it can find business logic flaws and other types of vulnerabilities that traditional SAST scanners miss.
Findings appear as inline pull request comments, with enough context for engineers to reproduce and fix the issue. Every finding comes with a proof-of-concept exploit, and an AI prompt that can be used to fix the issue.
Triage comments and project rules become feedback. When developers and security engineers leave comments on findings, Hacktron learns what is urgent, irrelevant, trusted, or intentionally ignored for each codebase.
Start with a free trial or book time to walk through your repositories and review workflow.